comprised of six faqihs (Islamic law experts) and six legal jurists — is in charge of protecting the Constitution and vetting candidates for elected offices based on the supreme law’s requirements.
Hadi Tahan Nazif, a jurist on the Council, said on Tuesday that the body’s interpretation of the Constitution did not put in place any impediment to a woman running for president and that women could register for the upcoming election.
He did acknowledge, however, that views differed on the matter.
Article 115 of the Iranian Constitution states that a presidential candidate must, among other things, be a political and religious rajol, a word borrowed from Arabic that literally translates as “man.”
Some jurists on the Council take the literal sense and argue that women cannot run for president, while others have argued that the world rajol could also be interpreted as a certain “personality” rather than merely a “man.”
The Council is yet to offer a binding constitutional interpretation on the matter. Earlier this week, it released a new interpretation of the Constitution aimed at clarifying the criteria for presidential candidates, but the issue was not directly addressed.
Under the Council’s new interpretation, all nominees would have to be between 40 and 70 years of age, hold at least a master’s degree or its equivalent, have a work experience of at least four years in managerial posts (with specific criteria of its own), and have no criminal record. Furthermore, top military commanders with the status of major general and higher are also allowed to run.
Tahan Nazif defended the 12 criteria presented in the interpretation, describing them as a step toward more “transparency.” He rejected criticism that the newly-updated requirements were not in harmony with the Constitution.
The administration of President Hassan Rouhani has taken issue with the Council’s new interpretation of the Constitution, saying the Interior Ministry should take existing law into account while registering presidential nominees.